Posts

Why Most "Creative Problem Solving" Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)

Three weeks ago, I walked into a boardroom in Melbourne where twelve middle managers were sitting around throwing foam balls at each other. The facilitator—some twenty-something with a psychology degree and zero real-world experience—was encouraging them to "think outside the box" while they built towers with marshmallows and spaghetti.

That's when it hit me. We've completely stuffed up creative problem solving in Australian business.

After twenty-two years of consulting across everything from mining operations in Perth to tech startups in Sydney, I've seen enough "innovation workshops" to last three lifetimes. Most of them are absolute garbage. Expensive garbage that makes executives feel good about "investing in creativity" while solving precisely nothing.

The Real Problem with Problem Solving

Here's what nobody wants to admit: creativity isn't the problem. Most workplaces aren't lacking creative ideas—they're drowning in them. Every second employee has a brilliant suggestion about how to fix everything wrong with the company. What's missing is the grunt work that turns those ideas into actual solutions.

I learned this the hard way back in 2019 when I convinced a logistics company in Brisbane to implement every "creative solution" their staff suggested during a month-long innovation challenge. Forty-seven ideas. We tried them all.

Chaos doesn't begin to describe it.

The problem wasn't that the ideas were bad—some were genuinely brilliant. The problem was that creativity without structure is just expensive procrastination. You can brainstorm until the cows come home, but if you can't systematically evaluate, test, and implement your ideas, you're just playing expensive parlour games.

What Actually Makes Creative Problem Solving Work

Real creative problem solving isn't about thinking outside the box—it's about building better boxes.

The most successful problem solvers I've worked with follow a deceptively simple pattern:

They start with constraints, not possibilities. Instead of asking "What could we do?" they ask "What can't we do, and why?" This immediately eliminates 73% of the useless suggestions that waste everyone's time in typical brainstorming sessions.

They steal shamelessly. The best solutions rarely come from pure innovation. They come from adapting what already works somewhere else. That mining company that revolutionised their safety protocols? They copied Toyota's manufacturing principles. The restaurant chain that doubled their customer satisfaction? They borrowed Disney's customer service playbook.

They test small and fail fast. Rather than implementing grand visions, they run tiny experiments. If it works on a small scale, scale it up. If it doesn't, bin it and move on. No drama, no committee meetings to discuss why it failed.

The Australian Advantage (That We're Completely Wasting)

Australians are naturally good at practical problem solving. We had to be—stuck out here at the arse end of the world, we learned to make do with what we had. That "she'll be right" attitude that everyone mocks? It's actually a massive competitive advantage when channelled properly.

But somehow in our corporate environments, we've convinced ourselves that problem solving needs to be complicated. We bring in expensive consultants from overseas (present company excluded, obviously) to teach us frameworks that our grandfathers knew instinctively.

Take Bunnings, for example. Their entire business model is built on practical problem solving. Need to fix something? Here's everything you need in one place, plus a sausage sizzle. No fancy innovation labs, no design thinking workshops—just relentless focus on solving real problems for real people.

Compare that to some of the major retailers I've worked with who spend months in "ideation phases" before deciding whether to change their store layout. By the time they've finished their creative process, three smaller competitors have already solved the same problem and stolen their customers.

The Dirty Secret About Innovation

Most breakthrough innovations aren't creative at all—they're just logical solutions to obvious problems that everyone else was too busy being "strategic" to notice.

Consider Afterpay. Revolutionary fintech innovation, right? Bollocks. It's layby with better marketing. The founders didn't invent some groundbreaking new financial instrument—they just noticed that young people wanted to buy stuff without credit cards and built a simple solution.

Or look at Canva. Game-changing design platform? Sure, but the core insight was embarrassingly obvious: most people aren't graphic designers but still need to make things look professional. Instead of trying to educate everyone about design principles, they just made design easier.

The pattern is always the same. Someone notices an obvious problem, builds an obvious solution, and everyone else slaps their forehead and says "Why didn't I think of that?"

Where Most Training Gets It Wrong

The creative problem solving industry has convinced itself that the bottleneck is idea generation. It's not. Ideas are cheap. Implementation is expensive.

I've sat through countless sessions focused on brainstorming techniques and divergent thinking exercises. They're fine as warm-up activities, but they're solving the wrong problem. It's like teaching someone to be a better driver by only practising in the car park.

Real problem solving happens when you're dealing with actual constraints: limited budgets, difficult stakeholders, regulatory requirements, technical limitations. The creativity comes from working within those constraints, not pretending they don't exist.

What Works Instead

The most effective problem-solving approach I've seen combines structured thinking with practical experimentation. Here's how it actually works:

Define the real problem, not the symptoms. This takes longer than you think and involves more questions than answers. Most teams jump straight to solutions without understanding what they're actually trying to solve.

Map the constraints explicitly. What can't change? What resources are available? Who needs to approve changes? Get all the limitations on the table before you start generating ideas.

Generate multiple solution pathways. Not just multiple ideas—multiple different approaches to the same problem. If one pathway hits a roadblock, you've got alternatives ready.

Test assumptions quickly. Every solution contains hidden assumptions. Find them fast through small experiments rather than lengthy analysis.

The magic happens when you combine systematic thinking with rapid experimentation. Structure gives you direction; speed gives you learning.

The Implementation Reality Check

Here's where most creative problem solving completely falls apart: the gap between workshop and workplace.

In workshops, everyone's enthusiastic. Barriers don't exist. Resources are unlimited. Politics disappear. Everyone agrees that change is necessary and good.

Back in the real world, budgets are tight, stakeholders have competing priorities, and that brilliant solution you developed requires approval from seventeen different people, three of whom are currently on leave.

This is why I've started incorporating what I call "implementation friction" into every problem-solving session. We deliberately add realistic constraints: "You have $500 and two weeks." "The IT department says no." "Legal needs to approve anything customer-facing."

Suddenly, those creative solutions get a lot more practical very quickly.

The Psychology of Workplace Creativity

Most people think they're not creative because they can't draw or write poetry. That's nonsense. Workplace creativity is about connecting dots that others haven't connected yet.

The accountant who figures out a new way to structure budgets that saves time and improves accuracy? That's creative problem solving.

The warehouse supervisor who reorganises workflow to eliminate bottlenecks? Creative problem solving.

The customer service rep who develops a script that actually helps people instead of frustrating them? Definitely creative problem solving.

We've somehow convinced ourselves that creativity only counts if it involves whiteboards and sticky notes. Real workplace creativity is usually much more mundane and much more valuable.

The Tools That Actually Matter

Forget the fancy frameworks. The most useful problem-solving tools are embarrassingly simple:

The Five Whys. Keep asking "why" until you get to the root cause. Works every time, requires no special training.

Assumption mapping. Write down every assumption your solution depends on, then test the riskiest ones first.

The premortem. Imagine your solution failed spectacularly. What went wrong? Plan for those failures in advance.

Constraint relaxation. Pick one constraint and temporarily ignore it. What becomes possible? Sometimes the constraint isn't as fixed as you thought.

These aren't sophisticated techniques, but they work because they force you to think systematically about real problems rather than generating random ideas.

Why Australian Businesses Need This More Than Ever

The global economy is moving fast, and our traditional advantages—natural resources, geographic isolation that protected local markets—aren't enough anymore.

We need to get better at solving problems quickly and pragmatically. Not because we're behind, but because we're competing with businesses that can iterate faster than we can strategise.

The companies that thrive in the next decade won't be the ones with the most creative workshops or the fanciest innovation labs. They'll be the ones that can identify real problems and implement practical solutions while their competitors are still in planning meetings.

That's not about being less creative—it's about being more focused with our creativity.

The Bottom Line

Creative problem solving isn't about creativity. It's about solving problems.

Everything else is just expensive team building.